- This topic has 4 stemmer and 21 svar.
Anonym10-04-2009 11:25 ForfatterIndlæg
10. april 2009 kl. 11:25 #89818Anonym10-04-2009 11:25
Loven afgør, hvad der er et betalingsmiddel, legal tender, og som kan bruges som indløsningsmiddel af varer. Punktum og slut.
Et system man kan stole på? Formentlig er ikke een af de eksisterende valutaer konvertibel i nogetsomhelst og slet ikke guld og udsat for konstant og voldsom værdiforringelse.
Den amerikanske dollar har tabt 98 % af sin værdi siden 1900.
Det væsentligste bedrag et menneske kan udsættes for, er den ham af staten påførte inflation. Vore regeringer er ansvarlige for det største tyveri, vi udsættes for.
Befolkningen så hjernevasket, at den ikke evner at forstå de simpleste økonomiske sammenhænge.
Ingen kan benægte, at guld er et betalingsmiddel, som er suverænt, om det er legal tender eller ej.
Opinionen søges bildt ind, at den økonomiske krise springer ud af den tomme luft, medens den har været i konstant udvikling siden forrige århundreds begyndelse, altså ca. år 1900.
Der bliver ingen løsning på denne økonomiske krise, fordi viljen totalt mangler.
Vi kommer til at bevæge os fra den ene rædsel til en der er værre.10. april 2009 kl. 11:44 #138002Anonym10-04-2009 11:44
The Pamela and Mary Anne Aden’s Aden Forecast is typical, commenting recently:
“Gold is the ultimate inflation hedge, and there’s no telling where it’ll end up, at least well into the thousands of dollars in the years ahead, and maybe sooner. … Remember, gold’s peak in 1980 at $850 is now the equivalent of about $2,200 in today’s dollars. Gold has not even approached that level yet. Once the dollar declines again and inflation kicks in, it’ll be another story.”
And how many thousands of dollars? The Aden sisters write: “Using the gains in the 1970s as an example to forecast where gold could end up … $5,800 would be the equivalent upside target.”
Det med det ultimative inflationsværn skal tages med et gran af salt, måske et bedre deflationsværn, men ultimativt bedst som værn mod korrupte uduelige regeringer, hvis bare nogle værdier skal bevares fra staternes tyvagtige hænder.
Værn mod tyveri den vigtigste faktor guld besidder.10. april 2009 kl. 11:59 #138004Anonym10-04-2009 11:59
Værd at skrive sig bag ørerne, at hvad angår økonomisk kriminalitet, så udgår den fra statsapparatet selv og beskyttes af selvsamme institution. Det går som gældende lov og ret.10. april 2009 kl. 22:09 #138020Anonym10-04-2009 22:09
Det som du kalder “Staten” udgør i virkeligheden skiftende personer af skiftende politisk observans. At betragte staten som en individuel, uforanderlig størrelse giver ingen mening.
Den nuværende situation, der betegnes som krise, og som i virkeligheden er et gennemsnit – nogen lider tab, men der er stadig ganske mange som oplever fortsat vækst – er guf for dommedagsprofeter og konspirationsteorier.
Dette har vi allerede set mange eksempler på!
At en lavkonjunktur følger en højkonjunktur er dog lige så sikkert som Amen i kirken. Og nu er den her.
De økonomiske teorier holder stik.
Og i Danmark er inflationen heldigvis stadig relativt lav.
Sov trygt.11. april 2009 kl. 10:25 #138030Anonym11-04-2009 10:25
Antony er nok en forsovset dansker uden megen økonomisk forståelse.
Guld og sølv er de eneste økonomiske aktiver udenfor et iøvrigt korrupt økonomisk system, og er i øjeblikket de eneste forsvarsmidler til bevaring af værdier, hvilket formueejere til deres fortydelse snart vil sande, når deres formuer er gået tabt.11. april 2009 kl. 10:28 #138032Anonym11-04-2009 10:28
Grudlæggende foranstaltning for at skabe et troværdigt financielt skifte er at genskabe troværdige valutaer ude af de kriminelles hænder.11. april 2009 kl. 12:09 #138036Anonym11-04-2009 12:09
Gold outperformed cash ISAs, property and shares over last 10 years
By Deborah Hyde | 00:01:00 | 06 April 2009
Gold has outperformed cash ISAs, property and the FTSE since 1999 when hit a low just above $250.
Gold has averaged an annual gain of 15% since the start of 2000 but has accelerated since the collapse of Northern Rock, jumping by 81% amid increasing investor nervousness.
This compares with an annual average gain of 9.1% for Property, 4.75% for Cash ISAs and a 3.09% fall on the FTSE 100 over the same period, said BullionVault, which provides an online service for gold bullion investment and ownership.
‘We live in a time where almost every asset class is under assault and confidence in the financial markets around the world has suffered. It is certainly not surprising that gold is again front of mind for private investors,’ said Adrian Ash, head of research at BullionVault.
Investors have sought a store of value as the combination of increased money supply and the implications of governmental fiscal stimulus packages resurrect the spectre of inflation around the world. There is now widespread fear regarding the debasement of currencies beyond the US dollar weakness, and gold has a long and proven history as an efficient currency hedge, Ash added.
Meanwhile, Tom Elliott, global strategist at JP Morgan Asset Management points out the nominal price of gold fell to a low of $252 in 1999 from $850 in 1980.
And while it is well know that gold is attractive at times of inflation, Elliott said gold can provide a good hedge against deflation.
‘In a deflationary environment, goods and services become cheaper in local currency terms. Therefore, rather than investing money in assets that are falling in value, in deflationary circumstances gold is often used as a safe haven and store of wealth,’ he said.
Credit Suisse strategist Andrew Garthwaite agrees gold can be a good two way bet for investors.
He has been overweight gold for two years and believes it will benefit whichever one of his three scenarios for outcomes of the crisis materialises.
If governments take over private sector liabilities and default, he believes it would be bullish for gold as both central banks and investors would then diversify away from government bonds.
He said if governments fail to do enough and deep deflation is the result it could be bad for gold. However, he points out gold rose almost 70% in nominal terms during the acute deflation of the early 1930s12. april 2009 kl. 8:03 #138046Anonym12-04-2009 8:03
At man ikke sikkert over lang tid kan disponere over betalingsmidler (legal tender), fordi det er så som så med værdibestandigheden, gør det formålsløst med enhver opsparing indenfor det financielle systems kendte rammer.
Den der gemmer til natten gemmer til katten.
Egentlig forfærdende med en sådan konklusion, der på forfærdende måde er en trussel, der vil udslette vor samfundsform og enhver form for civilisation.12. april 2009 kl. 14:37 #138062Anonym12-04-2009 14:37
Endnu en gang tilsviner kvaksalveren René Cohrt folk, der tillader sig at være uenigem med hans vås. Vorherre bevares. Folk som du burde jages ud over markerne!12. april 2009 kl. 18:35 #138068Anonym12-04-2009 18:35
Jeg sparer op til et hus, og det har da aldrig givet mere mening end nu. Før finanskrisen, og faldet i huspriserne, som jeg i øvrigt ser som to forskellige ting, steg huspriserne hurtigere end min opsparing, og det virkede lidt meningsløst. Nu stiger min opsparing hurtigere end boligpriserne, og dermed kan jeg forhåbentligt spare op, så jeg kan nøjes med at belåne de 80% af huset, som var min plan fra starten. Ved at spare op sparer jeg senere renteudgifter og gebyrer, dvs. selv om min opsparing vokser naturligt, og ikke ved hjælp af spekulationer, giver det nu igen mening, som det skal og bør.
Jeg har derfor modsatte holdninger end renecort. Nu giver min opsparing mening og mindre frustrationer over vanvittigt stigende priser. Jeg har ikke tabt penge ved at have dem stående i kontanter, og kun hvis huspriserne stiger ud over inflationen igen, vil jeg tabe penge på min opsparing, hvilket jeg også ville gøre hvis jeg købte guldpapirer.12. april 2009 kl. 18:37 #138070Anonym12-04-2009 18:37
Faktuel oplysning opfattes af de sarte som tilsvining, hvor åndssvag har man lov at være.13. april 2009 kl. 15:34 #138084Anonym13-04-2009 15:34
“Antony er nok en forsovset dansker uden megen økonomisk forståelse.”
Det er vel næppe udtryk for noget faktuelt, men snarere at du er en mavesur gammel tosse, som griber til grovheder, når din intellektuelle kapacitet kommer til kort…13. april 2009 kl. 15:47 #138088Anonym13-04-2009 15:47
Jeg prøver endnu en gang med en lektie om, hvorfor vi fortaber vores personlige frihed og økonomi, vel vidende, at det formentlig er forgæves.
The Deadly Financial Warfare
What`s true for Iceland holds everywhere, including the developed world, the idea being to enrich finance capitalism through state-sponsored debt bondage and neo-feudal impoverishment.
by Stephen Lendman
This article addresses Washington’s financial coup d’etat in the context of discussing Michael Hudson’s important, very lengthy and detailed April 5 Global Research.ca one titled: “The Financial War Against Iceland – Being defeated by debt is as deadly as outright military warfare.” It reviews its key information in advance of Hudson’s April 14 scheduled appearance on The Global Research News Hour to discuss.
What’s true for Iceland holds everywhere, including the developed world, the idea being to enrich finance capitalism through state-sponsored debt bondage and neo-feudal impoverishment. The global economic crisis was no accident. It was long ago hatched, and has been brewing for years, gestating, percolating, then bubbling into the 2000 tech crash, a mere prelude for today’s greater one spreading everywhere like a cancer but hitting the developing world and most indebted nations hardest.
Hudson: “Iceland is under attack – not militarily but financially.”
Like many others, “It owes more than it can pay” and is bankrupt. It was planned that way, and the idea is to strip-mine the nation and its people of their resources, enterprises, assets, land, homes, jobs and futures through perpetual debt bondage. Bankers get enriched. Nations and people, however, are discarded like trash, with the IMF as enforcer, to be reinvigorated with an additional (G 20-pledged) $750 billion, quadrupling its resources to $1 trillion if fulfilled.
Wall Street and Western European bankers planned it and now ordered the government “to sell off the nation’s public domain, its natural resources and public enterprises to pay (its) financial gambling debts.” Also, raise permanent taxes at the worst possible time, then suck the maximum wealth from the country leaving behind an empty hulk and impoverished, desparate population. It’s called dystopia Merriam-Webster defines as: “an imaginary place where people lead dehumanized and often fearful lives,” the opposite of utopia under conditions of deprivation, poverty, disease, violence, oppression, and terror, much like in Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four.
Permanent debt bondage “is as deadly as outright military” defeat. Loss of livelihoods and assets leave people vulnerable to sickness, despair, and early deaths, much like what happened to post-Soviet Russia under Washington-imposed “shock therapy:”
— 80% of farmers went bankrupt;
— around 70,000 state factories closed;
— unemployment became epidemic;
— a permanent underclass was created;
— poverty rose from two million in 1989 to 74 million by the mid-1990s, and in half the cases it was desperate;
— alcoholism and drug abuse soared;
— so did HIV/AIDS 20-fold;
— suicides also and violent crime four-fold; and
— the population declined by 700,000 a year; by 2007 it was 10% lower than in 1989 because of sharply reduced life expectancies.
Iceland, the developing world, and the West take note. This cancer is heading everywhere, courtesy of banker-imposed diktats, mainly from America and the UK. They insist Iceland “impoverish its citizens by paying debts in ways (they’d) never follow” even though the government has no way to do it.
No matter. “They are quite willing to take payment in the form of foreclosure on the nation’s natural resources, land and housing, and a mortgage on the next few centuries of its future” – perpetual debt bondage no different than the spoils of war under permanent occupation.
However, in this case, debtors are convinced to pay voluntarily “to put creditor interests above the economy’s prosperity (and) national interest.” Their indebtedness comes at a huge cost – “chronic currency depreciation (and) domestic price inflation for many decades to come.”
Contrast this to how developed countries, like America, handle debt – by inflating (not deflating) their way out to pay it off with cheap (reduced purchasing power) money because inflation erodes its value. It’s simple – by printing money and running budget deficits the way Washington did after Nixon closed the gold window in August 1971, ended the 1944 Bretton Woods Agreement, and no longer let dollars be backed by gold or converted into it in international markets. A new monetary system creates money like confetti, and lets us spend and live beyond our means, then have developing and indebted nations pay the price.
In recent years, dollar weakness and price inflation “wiped out much of the US international debt.” The Iceland model turns “this inflationary solution inside out….in violation of traditional credit practice.” Instead of currency inflation, Iceland “inflate(d) its way into debt, not out of it, (by) indexing (it) to the rate of inflation,” thus guaranteeing “a unique windfall for banks at the expense of wage earners and industrial profits.” The result: destruction of its traditional way of life.
Iceland must “repudiate this debt bomb” to escape. It’s indexed to inflation and “will never lose value.” It’s caught in a destructive whirlpool creating economic shrinkage, falling assets and wages in the face of perpetually burgeoning debt, the same global model needing to be exposed and renounced “now.” Otherwise, economies will be hollowed out, “capital formation will plunge,” people will be impoverished, and many won’t survive.
His expertise comes from “having been an insider to imperial-style plundering….for forty years” – as an economist for Chase Manhattan Bank, Arthur Andersen, and the UN Institute for Training and Development (UNITAR). He’s also taught economics since 1969, heads a Harvard-based economic and financial history group, is a Research Professor at the University of Missouri, and organized the first sovereign-debt fund in 1990 at Scudder, Stevens and Clark.
“All these jobs (except his current professorship) involved analyzing the limited ability of debtor countries to pay – how much could be extracted from them through foreign-currency loans and how much public infrastructure (could) be sold off (through) voluntary virtual foreclosure (under) creditor-dictated rules.”
He advises countries not to borrow in foreign currencies, instead “monetize their own credit for domestic spending and investment.” Iceland broke “the cardinal rule of international finance: Never borrow in a foreign currency for credit” that can freely be created at home. “Governments can inflate their way out of domestic debt,” not the foreign kind.
Post-Soviet economies did it the wrong way, now suffer, and recent riots highlight their problems. “Instead of helping them industrialize and become more efficient,” Western bankers loaded them with debt and exploited them – not for manufacturing and infrastructure development, as loans against existing real estate and infrastructure, to suck as much wealth out quickly.
It produced “bubble economies built on debt-financed real estate and stock market inflation,” illusory wealth “bubbles (that) always burst.” The only sustainable financing of imports is through enough exports for a favorable balance of trade.
De-industrialization destroys economies by shrinking them, the result of plunging property valuations, rental income, and exchange rates. Foreign currency mortgage costs exceed property values producing defaults and losses for lenders.
It’s hitting Sweden, Austria and leading creditor states like America and the UK. Real estate, stock market and employment are declining “in a straight line unprecedented even in the Great Depression.” It’s turned neoliberalism into a nightmare.
“Just as individuals can’t live off a credit card forever, neither can nations. As any classical economist knows, societies that only manufacture debt are unsustainable.” Eventually they collapse into bankruptcy just like a business or household. The old saying applies. Things that can’t go on forever, won’t.
No matter. Predator banks want to prolong the game as long as possible, grab all the wealth they can, force debtor nations to sell state enterprises at distress prices, then get new business by lending to investors who buy them on the cheap. Will it work? Only if targeted countries go along. In the case of Iceland, its very future is at stake.
Sound v. Imprudent Banking
For centuries, banks created credit responsibly – loaning money for sound investments to debtors able to repay with interest. No one imagined a world like today’s with massive defaults occurring globally. In America, one-third of home mortgages are in “Negative Equity;” that is, “the mortgage exceeds the (property’s) market price pledged as collateral.”
US national debt tripled in one year, from $5 – $15 trillion, and according to some economists like John Williams, it’s much higher under GAAP accounting – including unfunded liabilities around $65.5 trillion, an amount exceeding world GDP through FY 2008, meaning America is bankrupt. Williams also puts unemployment at 19.8% by reengineering it to include discouraged and involuntary part-time workers and excluding fictitious birth-death rate ratio inclusions.
Blunt Truths about the “Dismantling of Industrial Capitalism”
Instead of extending credit to construct and grow them, financial oligarchs turned indebted nations into “casinos (through) debt-leveraged gambles,” redistributing wealth upward and creating “debt peonage for most citizens.” Even in America, nearly half the population has no net worth, and the gulf between richest and the rest is unprecedented.
“This is the unfair system that the world’s top creditors would export to Iceland – if they can convince its voters (and leaders) to accept neoliberal debt pyramiding as a way to get rich.” It’s not working throughout post-Soviet states that see it as the road to hell, if public riots are a gauge.
“Better alternatives (are) the only defense” as it’s impossible for “astronomically indebted economies to ‘work their way out of debt.’ ” Trying will “collapse the currency’s exchange rate,” divert huge amounts of revenue and property to creditors, and produce “a new kind of post-capitalist (unjust, unsustainable) non-production/consumpton economy” too gruesome to imagine or tolerate.
Iceland’s financial crisis is the result of lawless predation, an “international (austerity demanding) Ponzi scheme” under rigged market rules imposing public and private “asset stripping” to pay debt. A simple scheme transfers wealth.
Economies and populations are trapped on a “debt treadmill from which there is no escape. (Lenders) pile on credit and let debts grow (through) the ‘magic of compound interest,’ knowing that loans cannot be repaid – except by asset sell-offs.” They’re strip-mined through unending debt service so the parasite keeps feeding on its food source. The idea is to get it all, leaving empty hulks behind, then on to the new victims. It’s “euphemistically dubbed post-industrial wealth creation,” the kind that’s collapsing economies globally and destroying people. Obama is commander-in-chief of the process.
America as Lead Predator
It’s a viciously ugly scheme that’s “trapped other countries into a nightmarish system in which (they’re practically forced) to recycle their excess balance-of-payment dollar inflows back to the US,” mainly as loans to the Treasury.
“When foreign central banks receive dollars for their exports (or asset sales),” their choices are limited. “Congress won’t let them buy important domestic companies or resources,” or get paid with US gold reserves. The alternative is buy Treasuries and mortgage-backed securities like Fannie and Freddie debt.
Icelanders and other nations must remember that America is the world’s largest debtor, and as Adam Smith explained in The Wealth of Nations – “no nation ever repaid its debt,” and he never envisioned one large as America’s. We grow it by issuing paper for real assets and services. Until other countries demand more than confetti, this “Madoff-Ponzi scheme” will persist – for tiny states like Iceland (population 319,000 as of January 2009) until nothing is left to hand over.
Today’s road to riches isn’t through capital investment. It’s by “foreclos(ing) at pennies on the dollar and mak(ing) ‘capital gains’ by flipping property onto (central bank-inflated) world financial markets.” In a word, socializing risks, privatizing profits, preying on the weak, and getting “a free lunch” at public expense.
It’s a zero-sum game. One side’s gain is another’s loss, and when it matches America against Iceland, it’s easy exerting pressure, but no certainty it’ll prevail. As a sovereign state, Iceland can choose. More on that below.
Throughout the process, “financialized wealth is extractive, not productive….because loans, stocks and bonds are claims on wealth,” not the kind produced by making things.
This is Iceland’s dilemma. “Homeowners are paying tribute, not in taxes to (an occupier), in interest to (debt pyramid, international creditor) sponsors of “over-financialization,” aiming to strip-mine the country of everything, the way it’s worked in many developing states. “Yet many Icelanders are heading into this future voluntarily” with little understanding of the trap, propelling them toward debt peonage destitution under the guise of an IMF rescuer – like a spider to a fly.
It shouldn’t happen and won’t if countries refuse to be trapped and extricate themselves in time. Iceland is at a crossroads, still able to avoid what ruined Russia, other post-Soviet states, South Africa, and many other nations misjudging America and the IMF are saviors, not world class predators.
“Back to the Future” – A New Age of Neo-feudal Debt Bondage
Conventional banking works by extending credit in the form of interest-bearing loans and seizing collateral only in cases of default. Central banks were created to finance governments and commercial ones to “expand trade, related infrastructure, mining and shipping,” and develop other forms of business and industry.
More recently, “financial managers persuaded many countries to sell off public enterprises, like their water or energy supplies, mainly to pay debts or cut taxes” for the rich. It’s turned debtor nations into “tollbooth economies in which basic services become a vehicle to extract greater and greater portions of national income and wealth for the benefit of the few.”
It’s the opposite of how classical economists define “free markets.” Today, financial interests control them to extract labor and capital investment-produced surpluses – for themselves under the guise of “economic democracy.” The result “pushed much of the Third World into poverty since the 1960s,” and now the same cancer is heading everywhere.
Financial Warfare As Deadly As by Armies
Today’s financial strategy is “multilateral (with) the IMF (and World Bank) act(ing) as enforcer(s) for global creditors to appropriate the income of real estate, national infrastructure and industry” by masquerading as a helping hand and seducing borrowers to believe it.
Here’s how neo-feudal banking works. It doesn’t create credit for manufacturing. Retained earnings and equity do it. It “create(s) credit primarily against (existing) collateral, and by so doing, “extract(s) money from the economy (and) undercuts industrial growth for “short-term speculative gains.” This hegemony “took thousands of years to achieve,” and it wasn’t easy inducing nations into poverty through “debt pyramiding as good economic strategy.” It’s like prescribing gorging as a way to lose weight or a junk food diet to stay healthy.
Iceland made it worse by “protecting the claims of creditors against debtors,” including most wage-earners. As post-bubble home prices plunged, creditors held their own and even “strengthen(ed) their hand by increasing their take,” thus making a bad situation worse. Its people own a shrinking equity in their homes vis-a-vis bankers having the lion’s share. Its law shifts homeowners to “Negative Equity,” and it works by keeping people in the dark.
But it’s much the same in the US to hide the root cause of today’s crisis – Wall Street/Washington’s engineered housing and debt bubble fraud amounting to financial piracy of the greatest magnitude. In America, Iceland, and elsewhere it’s turned “ownership” societies into “loanship” debt trap ones. Until recently, it was unthinkable to let economies be crippled by interest payments. Now it’s de rigueur through clever manipulation to convince people and nations to go along with their own demise.
For Iceland, its debt burden threatens its national identity and “loss of its future” the way Adam Smith explained – through bankruptcy when it’s too great to repay. “Today, creditors and bondholders care about foreign economies only to the extent that they can charge (enough) interest (to) absorb their entire economic surplus.” Getting it all is today’s credo, and nothing too outlandish is irresponsible. Get in trouble. Socialism comes to the rescue, for bankers, not people or easy targets like Iceland.
Its “ethic is mutual aid and prosperity for all….a highly socialized attitude (yet how tragic that it’s) lead the nation to (buy into) the snake oil (of) debt peonage.” Economic growth never keeps pace with accruing debts that get recycled into greater ones, but end games are the same. “Debts that can’t be paid, won’t be,” while bankers too big to fail get bailed out at the expense of public interests and sound economics. Yet Hudson explains: “Creditor mismanagement is the most important problem that any country should strive to avert.”
Most important is to foster a free and open market of ideas, to extract the best and discard the others. But that’s not how Western societies work, especially banker-run ones. A “free market” for them is “free” of ideas laying bare their snake oil.
“Most societies throughout history provide(d) credit…. without oligarchy.” Today it’s the opposite. Predatory finance erased centuries of reform and did it at warp speed. As a result, our freedom is threatened and very close to being lost.
What’s needed is a return to “basics, and a call for transparent statistics,” socially progressive ideas “of a just society free of economic privilege, free of prices in excess of socially necessary costs of production and of rentier income and wealth without effort,” earned “in their sleep,” not through their labor.
It means wealth should be based on “what one creates – not land and natural resources, or monopoly privileges to extract income via control of roads, the right to create money and other natural monopolies.” Reform depends on purging this privilege. “The way to do it is to treat banking like transportation and broadcasting, as a public utility,” not something privatized for “rentiers (to) tax society” for what rightfully belongs to everyone.
In the hands of predators, progressive reforms are impossible as financial giants “preserve their special privileges by law, minimizing taxes on themselves by shifting the burden onto labor and industry.” Financialization:
— “raise(s) the cost of living (and) doing business;”
— frees bankers’ “major customers – mortgage borrowers – from taxation to leave (maximum) surplus (for) interest;”
— collects public sector revenue “by capitalizing it into interest charges” and inflating housing, other real estate, and other business prices;
— “shift(s) taxes onto labor and industry, thereby raising prices and undermining the competitive power of financialized economies.”
This is predation, the very opposite of “classical free market policy.” Keynes concluded his General Theory by calling for “euthanasia of the rentier.” His followers advocate banking as a public utility “to steer debt creation to fund growth in the means of production, not economic overhead by inflating property bubbles.” None of that’s in sight. Maybe someday after the inevitable demise of the current system that will eventually crumble under its own weight.
Lessons for Iceland and Other Nations
Iceland “is under financial attack from outside as well as within – by foreigners supported by a domestic banking class. To succeed (they need) to convince the population that all debt is productive, and that the economy benefits to the extent that its net worth rises (that is, make its asset values appear greater than its debt).”
The fact is that prices don’t fall, “and if they do, debts should (remain), even (at the expense of) negative equity.” Icelanders are being manipulated to believe they have “no alternative but to pay debts that a few insiders (accumulated, ones) that accrue interest when (they’re) unpaid.” In fact, demanded debt amounts exceed what the country can pay, but the strategy is to conceal this as long as possible “to proceed with the foreclosure and voluntary pre-bankruptcy sell-off of national assets to pay” predators.
What’s true for Iceland, holds everywhere Wall Street and the IMF target, and here’s the scheme:
— shrink economies;
— shift wealth and property upwards to a financial oligarchy; and
— price “labor and industry out of world markets as a result of the heavy financial charges built into (the) pricing system.”
Iceland is a “model test case for economic justice.” Hopefully it will “confront reality sooner than later” and not get trapped into perpetual debt bondage by succumbing to global creditor pressure or seduction. What benefits them harms people, and everyone needs to know it. Bankers “aim (for) a return to ‘normalcy,’ defined as new exponential (debt volume) growth” producing more destructive bubbles like the last ones.
Iceland must reject Wall Street’s medicine or perish, and the same holds elsewhere, including in America. Bankers, not nations or people, should take the pain. Hudson asks: “How can Iceland (or Hungary, Latvia, Ukraine, or many other nations) pay its debts without bankrupting itself, (in Iceland’s case) abandoning its social democracy and polarizing its (people) between a tiny creditor oligarchy and” everyone else? They’re threatened by “a new ruling class that will control (their) destiny for the next century” or beyond. It’s their choice to reject it and stay free.
Their “foreign currency loans should be denominated in domestic currency at written-down (and de-indexed) interest rates, or repudiated outright.” The guiding principle should be to annul debts taken out under (destructive and extractive) terms benefitting creditors at the expense of their prey.
They aim to dominate societies – “above all….to maximize the power of debt over labor. The worse the economy does, the stronger” they get. It’s a vicious cycle “recipe for economic suicide (from perpetual) debt peonage.” Iceland can be a test case model against it. It comes down to whether it will back its people or, like America, surrender to financial predators. It’s much the same globally, the result of the greatest ever economic crisis opportunity for plunder. The perpetrators love it. It’s high time they got their comeuppance.
Imagine tiny Iceland taking the lead and fighting back against what another former high-level Wall Street and government insider warns – Catherine Austin Fitts, Assistant Secretary of Housing and Federal Housing Commissioner under GHW Bush and Dillon Read & Co. Managing Director and board member.
In her latest quarterly review, she predicts that “Obama will do more to help bankers achieve centralized control and one world government than any (previous) US politician.” In less than three months in office, he’s shown bankers they can count on him – to the tune of trillions of dollars, further open-ended checkbook amounts on request, and global “diplomatic” pressure on targeted nations to surrender. It’s for public rage, tiny Iceland, and other over-indebted nations to demand “no more.” Hopefully enough of them have backbone to do it.13. april 2009 kl. 15:53 #138090Anonym13-04-2009 15:53
Hovedessensen er had jeg konstant har prædiket:
A new monetary system creates money like confetti, and lets us spend and live beyond our means, then have developing and indebted nations pay the price.13. april 2009 kl. 16:03 #138092Anonym13-04-2009 16:03
Vuldarians lave irritabilitetsgrænse hænger måske sammen med, at han er uden midler, og derfor ikke rigtig kan forholde sig til, hvad der diskutteres.
Han burde formentlig vælge helt at holde sin kæft.
- Du skal være logget ind for at svare på dette indlæg.